The Darkling Thrush by Thomas Hardy

I leant upon a coppice gate

      When Frost was spectre-grey,

And Winter’s dregs made desolate

      The weakening eye of day.

The tangled bine-stems scored the sky

      Like strings of broken lyres,

And all mankind that haunted nigh

      Had sought their household fires.

The land’s sharp features seemed to be

      The Century’s corpse outleant,

His crypt the cloudy canopy,

      The wind his death-lament.

The ancient pulse of germ and birth

      Was shrunken hard and dry,

And every spirit upon earth

      Seemed fervourless as I.

At once a voice arose among

      The bleak twigs overhead

In a full-hearted evensong

      Of joy illimited;

An aged thrush, frail, gaunt, and small,

      In blast-beruffled plume,

Had chosen thus to fling his soul

      Upon the growing gloom.

So little cause for carolings

      Of such ecstatic sound

Was written on terrestrial things

      Afar or nigh around,

That I could think there trembled through

      His happy good-night air

Some blessed Hope, whereof he knew

      And I was unaware.

– Thomas Hardy

When I first read this poem, I was caught off guard by the language. Being a British writer, In The Darkling Thrush, Hardy uses British-specific words that required research for me to understand. However, it is not just region-specific vocabulary that stands out to me. Thomas Hardy uses specific diction as well when he uses specific words such as “bleak” or “ecstatic” to provide further detail and create an eerie environment. Outside of diction, Hardy uses other aspects to create this ominous mood. Hardy also uses imagery to paint a vivid picture of the desolate winter landscape, adding to this sense of eeriness. The way he describes the “spectre-gray” frost and the “tangled bine-stems” makes the scene feel lifeless and abandoned. Additionally, his use of contrast, like the sudden appearance of the thrush singing joyfully in such a bleak setting heightens the emotional impact. This creates a contrast of atmospheres, desolate and hopeful. The thrush represents a glimmer of hope or resilience in the midst of the speaker’s despair. However, Hardy’s tone stays somewhat somber, which makes this hopeful moment feel fleeting. The poem leaves me reflecting on how even the smallest spark of hope can stand out in dark times. My favorite thing about this poem is how Hardy speaks. The way this poem is written is suspenseful and leaves me wondering. I also think Hardy’s outlook is interesting, as he writes about the spread of hope through the thrush singing despite the desolate environment and conditions. “So little cause for carolings, Of such ecstatic sound.” This poem was originally titled, “By the Century’s Deathbed.” This is present when Hardy addresses the Century, using a capital C to personify the Century as a being rather than simply a time period.  “The Century’s corpse outleant, His crypt the cloudy canopy, The wind his death-lament.” This poem was published first in 1900, so obviously Hardy is referring to the end of the 19th Century. Hardy seems to me to be parting ways with the century in a tragic and saddened, yet hopeful and optimistic manner. I still need to decipher this further to understand the deeper meaning of the involvement of the century as the central point in this poem. Hardy’s complex and nuanced use of symbolism in The Darkling Thrush also stands out to me, particularly with how the thrush embodies both resilience and fragility. It’s fascinating how the thrush’s song manages to pierce through the speaker’s somber reflection, offering a faint, yet meaningful sense of renewal. I also appreciate how Hardy ties the natural world to human emotion, creating a connection between the external desolation and the speaker’s internal melancholy. This blending of hope and despair feels incredibly realistic, capturing the bittersweet nature of transition and change.


Expert Advice for Devising a Road Map to Electoral Victory in Battleground and Swing States by Ross White (Blog 2)

Let me divide the country and give you half: I will take the wheat, you may take the chaff. I will keep the President, you the Chief of Staff. I will take the hoi polloi, you the riff raff. A fair trade, I think, and how I am versed in fair: I measure every angle with a carpenter’s square. My depreciation calculations include wear and tear. I never post editorials under my nom de guerre. I could reasonably claim to be the intellectual elite: I can explain in few words the kinetic theory of heat. Complex equations are no mental aerobatic feat. My bomb shelter is made of steel-reinforced concrete. So allow me just this bit of moral vindication: don’t mention King Solomon as we break apart the nation.

– Ross White

The third word in this poem sums up the main idea in this poem, division. The poem revolves around the speaker’s proposal to divide the nation, but the division is unequal. “I will take the wheat, you may take the chaff. I will keep the President, you the Chief of Staff.” Through the contrast of wheat and chaff and the President and Chief of Staff, the speaker acknowledges inequality in their proposed division. This shows the deeper societal issue of inequality in political power and elitism, where the people in control justify inequity with “expert” guidance.  The tone of the poem adds a layer of sarcasm, with the speaker’s arrogance and self-proclaimed intellectual superiority critiquing hypocrisy and neglect in leadership. The unequal distribution of power emphasized in this poem shows how the elite unjustly have more political power, and thus the ability to propose unjust ideas. White also speaks on how the elite use intelligence and requirements in general to justify and assert authority in decision-making. “A fair trade, I think, and how I am versed in fair: I measure every angle with a carpenter’s square. My depreciation calculations include wear and tear. I never post editorials under my nom de guerre. I could reasonably claim to be the intellectual elite: I can explain in few words the kinetic theory of heat.” In these lines the speaker reinforces the idea that they are fair, attempting to cast the division as a fair agreement rather than a power grab. The presence of just one speaker shows how this is a one-way discussion, with the group on the other side of the split not getting the representation to fight back against the claims made by the speaker. White closes the poem with the mention of King Solomon. “So allow me just this bit of moral vindication: don’t mention King Solomon as we break apart the nation.” This line warns about the dangers of unchecked power and its ramifications. The speaker continues to create a fear of unchecked power with the mention of their steel-reinforced concrete bomb shelter. “My bomb shelter is made of steel-reinforced concrete.” The speaker being in power and having a steel-reinforced concrete bomb shelter implies that the speaker could cause chaos to some degree and be able to hide away in a protected area, while the common people would suffer and face the consequences of the elite’s actions. With that line, White is continuing his critique of hypocrisy in leadership and the unfortunate fact that people without political power do not get a say in decision-making, but oftentimes feel the consequences and take the damage for the actions of those in power. If it wasn’t already apparent, the steel-reinforced concrete bomb shelter displays the priority of self-preservation and detachment from the common people by the speaker. The speaker would rather save themself from fallout and potential chaos rather than devise a solution and deal with any chaos that ensues, as their job of being the leader of the people details. However, the speaker doesn’t care about leadership but rather simply power. The speaker’s priority of saving themself shows their selfishness in leadership, which due to the nature of leadership being built around selflessness, displays the incompetency of the speaker to be a just leader. In conclusion, White uses the distribution of power and wealth to highlight a reason for conflict and ineffective leadership, likely with the goal of opening the minds of people and telling a side of the story not often told. In this time of division, White believes that we shouldn’t trust the elite in leadership, and that successful leadership should be authentic and selfless.